For the bar and the bench
Human in the Loop independent review of legal citations by qualified, vetted law students.
AI can produce a convincing citation in seconds—even when the case does not exist or the quotation is wrong. 2dcite adds an independent human reviewer before an error becomes a filing, a sanction, or a reputational crisis.
Approved 2L and 3L law students check citations against the underlying authorities and document the work in a Certificate of Citation Review.
Independent verification only—not legal advice. Ultimate responsibility remains with the licensed attorney or judge. Full disclaimer · About 2dcite
Already have an account? Sign in · Apply as a student
Ninth Circuit · June 3, 2026
From Lnu v. Blanche
…be aware of the risks of overreliance on generative AI, read everything cited in a court filing—whether drafted by generative AI or not…
Regardless of how the filing is prepared, the signature is an attestation that the signer has reviewed the filing and is responsible for the accuracy of its contents.
Independent human verification helps you discharge that duty before you sign. Verify my citations
Why human-in-the-loop
Automation accelerates the work. Humans verify the truth.
Generative tools produce language that is fast and persuasive—not authoritative. A fabricated case can look real. An altered quotation can sound exact.
2dcite inserts an independent reviewer between the draft and professional reliance. The reviewer does not ask another AI whether a cite is correct; they check the underlying authority.
A reviewer evaluates whether:
- The cited authority exists and is correctly identified
- Quoted language appears in the source
- The cited proposition is actually supported
- Court, date, and other identifiers are accurate
- Material discrepancies should be flagged to the submitter
Technology-speed work with human accountability
No process guarantees a flawless filing. Human review adds judgment, skepticism, and source-level inspection—safeguards automated output cannot provide on its own.
Why verification matters
Fake citations create real consequences.
Courts have sanctioned attorneys for nonexistent cases, fabricated quotations, and inaccurate authorities—including AI-generated material filed without adequate verification. Attorneys face sanctions, fee awards, disciplinary referrals, practice restrictions, and potentially career-altering consequences when citations go unchecked.
In Lnu v. Blanche (9th Cir. June 3, 2026), the court sanctioned counsel and imposed a six-month suspension from practice before the Ninth Circuit for briefs with nonexistent cases, misattributed quotations, and gross misrepresentations of real authorities—and for lack of candor about generative-AI hallucinations.
Using AI may save time. Failing to verify its work can put a career, a client, and a case at risk. Spot-checking existence is not enough: a competent attorney must also read and reason.
The duty does not change because the tool changed
Lnu makes clear the rules attach at signing and filing—not research and drafting—whether the error came from generative AI or human drafting. ABA Formal Opinion 512 likewise holds lawyers responsible for competence, supervision, candor, and the accuracy of work submitted in a client’s name. AI does not sign the filing; the attorney does.
You should not have to grade your own work
The drafter knows what a sentence was meant to say and may read that meaning into the cited authority. An independent reviewer checks the source without that assumption. Independent review is not a substitute for attorney judgment—it is a safeguard for it.
A second set of eyes can uncover:
- Hallucinated cases and misquoted opinions
- Wrong authorities or unsupported propositions
- Incorrect courts, dates, or reporter information
- Errors carried forward from templates or prior filings
How 2dcite works
Four steps from upload to certificate. Liability remains with you; the student provides independent verification only.
- Step 1
Upload your document
Submit a brief, proposed order, or table of authorities—before or after filing.
- Step 2
Receive an independent review
An approved 2L or 3L, bound by confidentiality, checks citations against the underlying sources.
- Step 3
Review the findings
You alone decide any correction, errata, withdrawal, or other action under applicable rules.
- Step 4
Document the process
A Certificate of Citation Review evidences that independent verification was completed.
Simple fixed pricing
Transparent per-job fees, or a monthly membership for regular filers. Recommended maximum 25 pages per review.
Standard
$79.00per review
48 hours after student accepts
- Independent citation verification
- Full PDF or table of authorities
- Certificate of Citation Review
Rush
Faster$119.00per review
24 hours after accept · priority matching
- Everything in Standard
- Faster turnaround after accept
- Priority place in the matching queue
Membership
Best value$99.00/ month
1 citation check per month · 10% off additional reviews
- 1 citation check included each month (Standard or Rush)
- 10% off every additional review
- Cancel anytime via support
- Same independent student review & certificate
How payment & escrow works
Payment is collected when you submit your document. 2dcite holds the funds until a Certificate of Citation Review is issued.
The student reviewer’s share is released only after the system automatically generates the Certificate of Citation Review. The platform retains its service fee.
You’re charged when you submit — fully refunded if your document isn’t reviewed.
Membership is billed monthly via Stripe. The included review resets each billing period. Student reviewers still receive their full share; membership discounts are absorbed by the platform.
Verification should leave a record.
A verbal assurance that someone “looked it over” is hard to document. The Certificate of Citation Review records that an independent citation review was performed—and may be retained for internal risk management or used as otherwise permitted.
It demonstrates process, not perfection:
- An independent review was requested and completed
- Citation verification was a distinct workflow step
- The submitter took an affirmative risk-mitigation measure
The certificate is not a warranty of accuracy, completeness, or outcome and does not transfer the licensed professional’s responsibility.
For law students
Students who review citations must meet the following requirements:
- Use a school-issued .edu email (necessary, not sufficient)
- Select a top U.S. law school from our list (or Not listed for case-by-case review)
- Be currently enrolled as a 2L or 3L
- Have taken and passed a legal writing course
- Be recommended by a professor
- Upload enrollment, legal writing, and recommendation proof
- Pass manual credential review (typically within 24 hours)
- Hold only one active assignment at a time after approval
Selected authorities
Public materials on generative AI and citation integrity.
- Lnu v. Blanche (9th Cir. June 3, 2026)Published disciplinary order: AI hallucinations, fabrications, misattributed quotes, and duty of candor — see quote above
- ABA Formal Opinion 512Generative AI tools and lawyer ethics duties
- Mata v. Avianca (S.D.N.Y.)Sanctions for nonexistent opinions with fabricated quotations and citations
Don’t trust the formatting. Verify the authority.
Before you rely on a citation, verify it.
One false authority can undermine an otherwise sound argument and create consequences far beyond the page it appears on. Add an independent human verification layer to your filing workflow.
AI can generate the citation. Only verification earns your confidence.
Standard, rush, or membership ($99/mo with 1 included review + 10% off extras).
Contact
Support: support@2dcite.com